DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT SUSTAINABILITY AWARENESS, ATTITUDES AND ACTIONS

DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT SUSTAINABILITY AWARENESS, ATTITUDES AND ACTIONS

S. Soleimani, A. Mughrabi, M. AlFar, M. Jaeger (2021).  DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT SUSTAINABILITY AWARENESS, ATTITUDES AND ACTIONS. 11.

Research on sustainability in Higher Education lacks the focus on measuring the differences in knowledge, attitudes and actions of students before and after being exposed to the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially within a West-Asian context. The 17 SDGs and their learning objectives, developed by the UNESCO (2017), represent the framework of this study. For each of the SDGs, a relevant learning objective has been selected for measuring the awareness, attitude and action of students working on an engineering design/build project in teams. The learning objective of each SDG has been selected based on relevance for the given context. Students participated in a questionnaire survey to evaluate their awareness, attitude and action related to the SDGs on a 4-point response scale. This has been done twice, before and after being exposed to a design/build project using a Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate (CDIO) framework. Descriptive statistics as well as inferential statistics have been carried out in order to analyze the impact of the project on students’ perspectives and illustrate the extent of the influence. Some SDGs were more affected by the project scenario than others. Scaffolding engineering students’ learning of the SDGs by personal reflection ensured that no goal is excluded from the learning process. The results show that students’ learning needs to be supported by reflection on these goals in order to avoid confining the learning process to SDGs that are developed more intensively by the project scenario. It is recommended to do future studies using an experimental/control group design in order to differentiate learning supported by reflection versus project scenario. The findings confirm the approach of including real life sustainability issues in the project scenario. This study is part of an ongoing research effort related to sustainability and engineering education in the region of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC).

Authors (New): 
Sayed Mohamad Soleimani
Abdullah Mughrabi
Maram AlFar
Martin Jaeger
Pages: 
11
Affiliations: 
Australian College of Kuwait, Kuwait
Keywords: 
Sustainability
Sustainable Development Goals
Knowledge
Awareness
Action
CDIO standard 4
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 8
Year: 
2021
Reference: 
Annan-Diab, F., & Molinari, C. (2017). Interdisciplinarity: Practical approach to advancing education for sustainability and for the Sustainable Development Goals. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), pp. 73-83.: 
Boluk, K. A., Cavaliere, C. T., & Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (2019). A critical framework for interrogating the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 2030 Agenda in tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27:7, 847-864: 
Fountain, S. (1999). Peace education in UNICEF. Working Paper. New York, NY: UNICEF.: 
Garland, R. (1991). The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable? Marketing Bulletin, 2, 66-70. http://marketing-bulletin.massey.ac.nz/V2/MB_V2_N3_Garland.pdf: 
Gereluk, D. (2012). Education, extremism and terrorism: what should be taught in citizenship education and why. New York: Continuum: 
Huntzinger, D. N., Hutchins, M. J., Gierke, J. S., & Sutherland, J. W. (2007). Enabling sustainable thinking in undergraduate engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 23(2), p. 218.: 
Jain, S., Aggarwal, P., Sharma, N., & Sharma, P. (2013). Fostering sustainability through education, research and practice: a case study of TERI University. Journal of cleaner production, 61, pp.20-24.: 
Pfahl, D., Laitenberger, O., Ruhe, G., Dorsch, J., & Krivobokova, T. (2004). Evaluating the learning effectiveness of using simulations in software project management education: results from a twice replicated experiment. Information and Software Technology, 46, pp. 127-147.: 
Shephard, K., & Furnari, M. (2013). Exploring what university teachers think about education for sustainability. Studies in Higher Education, 38(10), pp.1577-1590.: 
Sunthonkanokpong, W., & Murphy, E. (2019). Sustainability awareness, attitudes and actions: A survey of pre-service teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 29(2), 562-582.: 
Svanström, M., Lozano‐García, F. J., & Rowe, D. (2008). Learning outcomes for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(3):339–351.: 
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2008). ICT competency standards for teachers: Competency standards modules. Centre on Education and Training for Employment, Ohio State University, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse.: 
UNESCO (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO Education 2030. Paris, France: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002474/247444e.pdf, accessed 26 January 2020.: 
Willats, J., Erlandsson, L., Molthan-Hill, P., Dharmasasmita, A., & Simmons, E. (2018). A university wide approach to embedding the sustainable development goals in the curriculum—a case study from the Nottingham Trent University’s Green Academy. In Implementing Sustainability in the Curriculum of Universities (pp. 63-78). Springer, Cham.: 
Go to top