STUDENTS' VIEWS OF SELF-REGULATED LEARMIMG STARTEGIES IN A BLENDED MODULE

STUDENTS' VIEWS OF SELF-REGULATED LEARMIMG STARTEGIES IN A BLENDED MODULE

S. Yap (2021).  STUDENTS' VIEWS OF SELF-REGULATED LEARMIMG STARTEGIES IN A BLENDED MODULE. 12.

This paper seeks to contribute insights from an inquiry into how some students at Singapore Polytechnic (SP) viewed Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) strategies in a blended professional communication skills module in relation to their ability to manage their learning and self-development. SRL strategies may serve as drivers of students’ ability to participate and develop in self-directed learning, and our findings indicated that respondents had positive beliefs about their value. However, these beliefs were rooted within conditions relating to the perceived practical value of the strategies for the given context and application, fit with personality, and ease-of-use, which informed or influenced students’ choices of learning strategy. Although this paper did not originate within a CDIO context, and is not specific to engineering students per se, engineering students were among the multi-disciplinary mix of respondents in the study, and we find that our insights may hold relevance for CDIO Standard 2 learning outcomes, as presented in CDIO Syllabus v2.0 (Crawley, Malmqvist, Lucas & Brodeur, 2011) in terms of topic 2.4 (Attitudes, Thought and Learning), specifically 2.4.2 (Perseverance, Urgency and Will to Deliver, Resourcefulness and Flexibility), 2.4.5 (Self-awareness, Metacognition and Knowledge Integration), 2.4.6 (Lifelong Learning and Educating), and 2.4.7 (Time and Resource Management). The insights may inspire us to give attention to how our students think and operate, help us reflect on the roles we play as educators, and offer some ideas as to the learning designs we might consider as well as other on-the-ground work that we need to do to support our students’ cultivation of self-regulatedness, self-directedness and life-long learning.

Authors (New): 
Sharon Yap
Pages: 
12
Affiliations: 
Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore
Keywords: 
Learning Behaviour
Learning strategies
Self-directed Learning
self-regulated learning
Self-Regulated Learning Strategies
CDIO Standard 2
Year: 
2021
Reference: 
Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner's self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24-32.: 
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13.: 
Cervin-Ellqvist, M., Larsson, D., Adawi, T., Stöhr, C., & Negretti, R. (2020). Metacognitive illusion or self-regulated learning? Assessing engineering students’ learning strategies against the backdrop of recent advances in cognitive science. Higher Education, 1-22.: 
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Lucas, W. A., & Brodeur, D. R. (2011). The CDIO syllabus v2.0. An updated statement of goals for engineering education. In Proceedings of 7th international CDIO conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.: 
Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & education, 104, 18-33.: 
Nelson, K. G., Shell, D. F., Husman, J., Fishman, E. J., & Soh, L. K. (2015). Motivational and self‐regulated learning profiles of students taking a foundational engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(1), 74-100.: 
Panadero, E. (2017) A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. Front. Psychol. 8:422.: 
10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Pardo, A., Han, F., & Ellis, R. A. (2016, April). Exploring the relation between self-regulation, online activities, and academic performance: A case study. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 422-429).: 
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., García, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivational strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.: 
Sharp, L. A., & Sharp, J. H. (2016). Enhancing student success in online learning experiences through the use of self-regulation strategies. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 27(2), 57-75.: 
Van Laer, S., & Elen, J. (2017). In search of attributes that support self-regulation in blended learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1395-1454.: 
http://dx.doi.org.sp.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9505-x
Verma, P., Ahuja, N. J., & Hermon, G. B. (2019, March). Past and Present of Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) in Digital Learning Environment (DLE): A Meta-Empirical Review. In International Conference on Advances in Engineering Science Management & Technology (ICAESMT)-2019, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, India.: 
Walther, J., Miller, S.E. and Sochacka, N.W. (2017), A Model of Empathy in Engineering as a Core Skill, Practice Orientation, and Professional Way of Being. J. Eng. Educ., 106: 123-148.: 
https://doi-org.sp.idm.oclc.org/10.1002/jee.20159
You, J. W. (2016). Identifying significant indicators using LMS data to predict course achievement in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 23-30.: 
Go to top
randomness