Focus on sustainability is increasing in engineering and management education, businesses, and the larger society. In order to cope with sustainability challenges, more holistic pedagogies and practices that foster interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary ways of thinking are needed. Thus, this exploratory paper aims to provide insights into developing a master’s-level course module on sustainability in business networks by using active learning through case-based teaching together with collaboration among three Nordic universities (NTNU, Vaasa, and Chalmers). The paper illustrates the multiple facets of designing, implementing, and evaluating three-party collaborative case-based learning based on an active learning approach that enhances students’ learning and performance. We conclude that the students are actively involved and learn better with case-based learning and can further empathize and associate with the case contexts. This can be achieved through engagement in cross-border collaboration, a mix of student backgrounds, flexibility in choosing cases, and clarity in case materials. Additionally, we encourage teachers to use a combination of innovative active learning methods to promote students’ in-depth understanding of complex sustainability-related challenges.
Pages:
567-580
Affiliations:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
Kokkola University Consortium, Vaasa, Finland
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Keywords:
Case-based learning
Active learning
Online learning
Sustainability
university collaboration
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
Year:
2023
Reference:
Becheikh, N., Mourad, M., & Tolba, A. (2022). Promoting Case-Based Learning in Business Higher Education in the Middle East and North Africa Region. Journal of Management Education, 46(4), 778-808. :
Bezanilla, M. J., Fernández-Nogueira, D., Poblete, M., & Galindo-Domínguez, H. (2019). Methodologies for teaching-learning critical thinking in higher education: The teacher’s view. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100584. :
Biggs, J. B. (1991). Approaches to learning in secondary and tertiary students in Hong Kong: Some comparative studies. Educational Research Journal, 6(1), 27-39. :
Bonwell, C. C., & Sutherland, T. E. (1996). The active learning continuum: Choosing activities to engage students in the classroom. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996(67), 3-16.:
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development:” Our Common Future.” United Nations. :
Case, J. M. (2019). A third approach beyond the false dichotomy between teacher- and student-centred approaches in the engineering classroom. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(5), 644-649.:
Cullen, J. G. (2017). Educating Business Students About Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review of Current Trends and Research Needs. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 429-439. :
Druckman, D., & Ebner, N. (2018). Discovery learning in management education: Design and case analysis. Journal of Management Education, 42(3), 347-374. :
Eizaguirre, A., García-Feijoo, M. & Laka, J. P. (2019). Defining Sustainability Core Competencies in Business and Management Studies Based on Multinational Stakeholders’ Perceptions. Sustainability, 11(8).:
Emblen-Perry, K. (2022). Auditing a case study: Enhancing case-based learning in education for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 381,134944.:
Figueiró, P. S., Neutzling, D. M., & Lessa, B. (2022). Education for sustainability in higher education institutions: A multi-perspective proposal with a focus on management education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 339, 130539. :
Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research. 5 ed. London, UK, Sage.:
Fontana, E., Öberg, C., & Poblete, L. (2021). Nominated procurement and the indirect control of nominated sub-suppliers: Evidence from the Sri Lankan apparel supply chain. Journal of Business Research, 127, 179-192. :
Grabinger, R. S., & Dunlap, J. C. (1995). Rich environments for active learning: A definition. Research in Learning Technology, 3(2), 5-34.:
Gramatakos, A. L., & Lavau, S. (2019). Informal learning for sustainability in higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(2), 378-392. :
Holt, D. (2003). The role and impact of the business school curriculum in shaping environmental education at Middlesex University. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(4), 324-343. :
Howlett, C., Ferreira, J.-A., & Blomfield, J. (2016). Teaching sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17(3), 305-321. :
Huggins, C. M., & Stamatel, J. P. (2015). An exploratory study comparing the effectiveness of lecturing versus team-based learning. Teaching Sociology, 43(3), 227-235.:
Kiron, D. (2012). Sustainability nears a tipping point. Strategic Direction, 28(7). :
Kohn Rådberg, K., Lundqvist, U., Malmqvist, J. & Hagvall Svensson, O. (2020). From CDIO to challenge-based learning experiences–expanding student learning as well as societal impact? European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(1), 22-37.:
Kolb, M., Fröhlich, L., & Schmidpeter, R. (2017). Implementing sustainability as the new normal: Responsible management education – From a private business school’s perspective. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2, Part B), 280-292. :
Kunselman, J. C., & Johnson, K. A. (2004). Using the case method to facilitate learning. College Teaching, 52(3), 87-92. :
Lönngren, J. (2017). Wicked Problems in Engineering Education: Preparing Future Engineers to Work for Sustainability. Doctoral thesis, Chalmers University of Technology.:
Lönngren, J. (2021). Wicked problems i lärande för hållbar utveckling – Vägledning för att ta fram exempel och problembeskrivningar. Högre utbildning,11(3). :
Lönngren, J., Svanström, M., Ingerman, Å. & Holmberg, J. (2016). Dealing with the multidimensionality of sustainability through the use of multiple perspectives – a theoretical framework. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(3), 342-35. :
Malmqvist, J., Lundqvist, U., Rosén, A., Edström, K., Gupta, R., Leong, H., Cheach, S. M., Bennedsen, J., Hugo, R., Kamp, A., Leifler, O., Gunnarsson, S., Roslöf, J. & Spooner, D. (2022). The CDIO Syllabus 3.0: An Updated Statement of Goals. Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference, Reykjavík University, 18-36.:
Maloni, M. J., Palmer, T. B., Cohen, M., Gligor, D. M., Grout, J. R., & Myers, R. (2021). Decoupling responsible management education: Do business schools walk their talk? The International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 100456. :
Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage publications.:
McCarthy, P. R. & McCarthy, H. M. (2006). When Case Studies Are Not Enough: Integrating Experiential Learning Into Business Curricula. Journal of Education for Business, 81(4), 201-204.:
McDonald, D., Holmes, Y., & Prater, T. (2020). The Rules of Engagement: A Test of Instructor Inputs and Student Learning Outcomes in Active versus Passive Learning Environments. E-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching, 14(1), 25-39.:
McDonald, D., Iscaro, V., & Posey, O. G. (2022). Active learning strategies in business education: using the law to build critical workforce skills. Journal of International Education in Business, 15(2), 406-424. :
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage. :
Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138.:
Rogers, M., Pfaff, T., Hamilton, J., & Erkan, A. (2015). Using sustainability themes and multidisciplinary approaches to enhance STEM education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(4), 523-536.:
Rusinko, C. A. (2010). Integrating sustainability in higher education: a generic matrix. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(3), 250-259. :
Sandri, O. (2011). The value of developing professional capabilities for sustainability. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of Australasian Campuses Towards Sustainability.:
Scholten, K., & Dubois, A. (2017). Advancing the skill set of SCM graduates – an active learning approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(11), 1683-1699. :
Segalàs, J., Ferrer-Balas, D. & Mulder, K. F. (2010). What do engineering students learn in sustainability courses? The effect of the pedagogical approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(3), 275-284.:
Stough, T., Ceulemans, K., Lambrechts, W., & Cappuyns, V. (2018). Assessing sustainability in higher education curricula: A critical reflection on validity issues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4456-4466. :
Säisä, M., Määttä, S., Roslöf, J. & Chee, T. (2020). International Cooperation between Two Project Learning Environments–a Case Study. Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference, 203-212.:
Tembrevilla, G., Nesbit, S., Ellis, N., & Ostafichuk, P. (2023). Developing transdisciplinarity in first-year engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(1), 43-63. :
Thürer, M., Tomašević, I., Stevenson, M., Qu, T. & Huisingh, D. (2018). A systematic review of the literature on integrating sustainability into engineering curricula. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 608-617.:
van Hoek, R., Godsell, J., & Harrison, A. (2011). Embedding “insights from industry” in supply chain programmes: the role of guest lecturers. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(2), 142-147.:
Wamsler, C. (2020). Education for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(1), 112-130. :
Yazici, H. J. (2004). Student perceptions of collaborative learning in operations management classes. Journal of Education for Business, 80(2), 110-118.:
on November 24, 2023 - 13:04 frebyst
Conceive
Design
Implement
Operate
