MAXIMISING ACADEMIC AND SOCIAL OUTCOMES

MAXIMISING ACADEMIC AND SOCIAL OUTCOMES

N. Cooke, J. Forss, S. Chung, J. Andersson (2023).  MAXIMISING ACADEMIC AND SOCIAL OUTCOMES. 644-655.

The MASOEE project brings together engineering faculties in the EUniWell alliance to share best practices for teaching transversal skills so that engineers contribute to societal well-being. The study combines the expertise of several engineering faculties at European universities. It focuses on sharing and developing expertise to improve the social outcomes of engineering students. Namely, researchers examine the similarities and differences between partners regarding their student bodies, teaching, programme structures, and institutions’ culture. Moreover, the work also explores how transversal skills are taught, what student attitudes are in terms of learning these skills, and how educators can better teach them.

The research design includes several activities across four work packages (WPs). To ensure that partners use the same skill descriptions, we use well-established organizations' existing definitions. WP1 strives to identify best practices within EUniWell based on the 15 entrepreneurial competencies defined in EU EntreComp Framework. WP2 targets engineering students' ability to solve complex challenges, communication, and networking skills defined in the "21st century skills" by the World Economic Forum. WP3 investigates the engineering schools’ capacity to train engineering students in sustainable competence, forming responsible engineers capable of developing sustainable solutions using the skills defined by the EU GreenComp. WP4 supports the other packages with engineering education research, specifically data collection and analysis, knowledge forming, and evaluation. The project runs from August 2022 until September 2023. 

The MASOEE project partners gather knowledge within their organisations through joint surveys and focus groups and collectively identify and share best practices. The engineering identity, taught as transversal skills by participating partners, can evolve from a traditional technologist identity along three paths: the self-made engineer, the progressive technologist, and the responsible engineer. By sharing best practices for teaching these skills, we believe we will better understand what the future engineer - who integrates all three identities – will be.

Authors (New): 
Neil Cooke
Jörgen Forss
Sarah Chung
Jesper Andersson
Pages: 
644-655
Affiliations: 
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
Linnaeus University, Sweden
Keywords: 
Social competencies
self-made engineer
21 century skills
Responsible engineer
Entrepreneurship
Sustainability competences
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 10
CDIO Standard 11
Year: 
2023
Reference: 
Bacigalupo, M. K. (2016). EntreComp: The entrepreneurship competence framework. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union,. : 
Berg, L. D. (2016). Producing anxiety in the neoliberal university. Canadian Geographer/le géographe canadien, 168-180. : 
Berge, M. S. (2019). In search of the new engineer: Gender, age, and social class in information about engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 650-665. : 
Bianchi, G., Pisiotis, U. and Cabrera Giraldez, M.,. (2022). GreenComp The European sustainability competence framework, Punie, Y. and Bacigalupo, M. editor(s). EUR 30955 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2022, ISBN 978-92-76-53201-9, doi:10.2760/821058, JRC128040.: 
Cech, E. (2013). The (mis) framing of social justice: Why ideologies of depoliticization and meritocracy hinder engineers' ability to think about social injustices. In J. Lucena, Engineering education for social justice (pp. 67-84). Dordrecht: Springer. : 
Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of disengagement in engineering education?. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42-72. : 
Deci, E. L. (2012). Self-determination theory. : 
Denscombe, M. (2017) The Good Research Guide. 5th edn. Open University Press.: 
Fabrigar, L. R. (2011). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press. : 
Faulkner, W. (2007). Nuts and Bolts and People' Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities. Social studies of science, 37(3), 331-356. : 
Faulkner, W. (2007). Nuts and Bolts and People' Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities. Social studies of science, 37(3), 331-356. : 
Guandalini, I. (2022). Sustainability through digital transformation: A systematic literature review for research guidance. Journal of Business Research, 148, 456-471 : 
Johnson, R. B. and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) ‘Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come’, Educational Researcher, 33(7), pp. 14–26. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033007014. : 
Johnson, R. B. and Turner, L. A. (2003) ‘Data collection strategies in mixed methods research’, in Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, pp. 297–319.: 
Lucas, B. C. (2014). Thinking Like an Engineer: Implications for the education system. London: Royal Academny of Engineering. : 
Maton, K. H. (2015). Knowledge-building: educational studies in legitimation code theory. routledge. : 
Nussbaumer, D. (2012). An overview of cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) use in classroom research 2000 to 2009. Educational review, 64(1), 37-55. : 
Redman, A. Wiek, A. (2021). Competencies for Advancing Transformations Towards Sustainability, a Systematic Review. Frontiers in Education, 6: 
Tormey, R. L. (2015). The formal and hidden curricula of ethics in engineering education. 43rd annual SEFI conference. : 
UNESCO (2020) Education for sustainable development: a roadmap, Paris : UNESCO, 2020 ISBN 978-92-3-100394-3 : 
Van den Bogaard, M. Y. (2021). A literature overview of differences between engineering education and other disciplinary education. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-4). IEEE. : 
Venn, R., Perez, P., Vandenbussche, V. (2022). Competencies of Sustainability Professionals: An Empirical Study on Key Competencies for Sustainability. Sustainability, 14(9), 4916. : 
World Economic Forum. (2016). New vision for education: Unlocking the potential of technology. Vancouver: British Columbia Teachers' Federation.: 
Go to top
randomness