VISUALIZING EXTRACURRICULAR STUDENT TEAMS LEARNING AT TU/e INNOVATION SPACE WITH CDIO SYLLABUS

VISUALIZING EXTRACURRICULAR STUDENT TEAMS LEARNING AT TU/e INNOVATION SPACE WITH CDIO SYLLABUS

E. Bravo, A. Valencia, I. Reymen, J. van der Veen (2023).  VISUALIZING EXTRACURRICULAR STUDENT TEAMS LEARNING AT TU/e INNOVATION SPACE WITH CDIO SYLLABUS . 820-830.

This paper's purpose is to present the findings of exploratory research performed at TU/e innovation Space to gain a better understanding of what students learn in extracurricular student teams. Having a better understanding of student learning can help us make such learning more visible, which has a positive impact on students' development of professional identity and employability. The scope of this study includes interviews with five alumni from student teams and an analysis of its outcomes. The results of the interviews' analysis showed that students recognized that they experienced learning gains because of their participation in student teams. However, the process of describing the learning gains in a detailed way is not easy for them, showing that their extracurricular efforts did not make these learning gains explicit. Students reported learning gains associated with personal and professional skills (CDIO syllabus section 2) and interpersonal skills, collaboration, teamwork, and communication (CDIO syllabus section 3). Peer interactions and learning by doing were the most relevant media that promoted those learning gains. Finally, we conclude that additional methods such as observations during teamwork can help understand the mechanisms that facilitate learning.

Authors (New): 
Eugenio Bravo
Ana Valencia
Isabelle Reymen
Jan van der Veen
Pages: 
820-830
Affiliations: 
Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
Keywords: 
Extracurricular
Student Teams
Challenge-based learning
Learning Gains
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO standard 4
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 6
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 11
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2023
Reference: 
Bacigalupo, M., Kampylis, P., Punie, Y., & Van Den Brande, L.(2016). EntreComp: The Entrepreneurship Competence Framework. EUR 27939 EN. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; 2016. JRC101581: 
Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J.D., & Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: Learning activities and leanring outcomes of experienced techers. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 533-548.: 
Bartram, D. (2005). The Great Eight Competencies: A Criterion-Centric Approach to Validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1185–1203.: 
Buckley, P., Lee, P. (2021). The impact of extra-curricular activity on the student experience. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(1), 37-48.: 
Clark, G., Marsden, R., Whyatt, J. D., Thompson, L., & Walker, M. (2015). It’s everything else you do: Alumni views on extracurricular activities and employability. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(2), 133–147. : 
Eichelman, K. M., Clark, R.M., & Bodnar, C.A. (2015). Assessing the impact of game based pedagogy on the development of communication skills for engineers. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA. United States. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.23590 ENAEE, “EUR-ACE Framework Standards for the Accreditation of Engineering Programmes”, 2021; www.enaee.eu [ENAEE Documents] (accessed 24/01/2023).: 
Immekus, J. C., Maller, S.J., Tracy, S., & Oakes, W.C. (2005). Evaluating the outcomes of a service-learning based course in an engineering education program: Preliminary results of the assessment of the engineering projects in community service—EPICS. 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR. United States. : 
Jorre de St Jorre, T., & Oliver, B. (2018). Want students to engage? Contextualise graduate learning outcomes and assess for employability. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 44-57.: 
Larson, R. W., Hansen, D. M., & Moneta, G. (2006). Differing profiles of developmental experiences across types of organized youth activities. Developmental Psychology, 42(5), 849-863: 
Leandro Cruz, M., Saunders, G.M., & Groen, P. (2019). Evaluation of competency methods in engineering education: a systematic review. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(5), 729-757. : 
Malmqvist, J., Lundqvist, U., Rosén, A., Edström, K., Gupta, R., Leong, H., Cheah, S.M., Bennedsen, J., Hugo, R., Kamp, A., Leifler, O., Gunnarsson, S., Roslof, J., & Spooner, D. (2022). The CDIO syllabus 3.0 - An updated statement of goals. Proceedings of the 18th International CDIO Conference (pp. 13-15). Reykjavik, Iceland: Reykjavik University.: 
Meijers, A. W. M., Borghuis, V. A. J., Mutsaers, E. J. P. J., Overveld, van, C. W. A. M., & Perrenet, J. C. (2005). Criteria voor academische bachelor en master curricula: Criteria for academic bachelor's and master's curricula. (2e, gew. dr. ed.) Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.: 
Team Polar.(2023). Team Polar Home. Retrieved April 18, 2023 from https://www.teampolar.org: 
Thompson, L.J., Clark, G., Walker, M., et al. (2013). It’s just like an extra string to your bow: Exploring higher education students’ perceptions and experiences of extracurricular activity and employability. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(2), 135–147.: 
SensUs.(2023). SensUs organization. Retrieved April 18, 2023, from https://www.sensus.org/: 
Seow, P., Pan, G. (2014). A literature review of the impact of extracurricular activities participation on students’ academic performance. Journal of Education for Business, 89(7), 361–366.: 
Stuart, M., Lido, C., Morgan, J., et al. (2011). The impact of engagement with extracurricular activities on the student experience and graduate outcomes for widening participation populations. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(3), 203–215.: 
van Ravenswaaij, H., Bouwmeester, R.A.M., van der Schaaf, M.F., Dilaver, G., van Rijen, H.V.M., & de Kleijn, R.A.M. (2022). The generic skills learning systematic: Evaluating university students’ learning after complex problem-solving. Frontiers in Education 7:1007361. : 
van Uum, M., & Pepin, B. (2022). Students’ self-reported learning gains in higher engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1-17. : 
Vermunt, J.D., Sonia, I., & Vignoles, A. (2018). Building the foundationsfor measuring learning gain in higher education: a conceptual framework and measurementinstrument. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 266-301. : 
Go to top
randomness